The best-case scenario after a motor vehicle collision involves the driver at fault accepting responsibility. Unfortunately, many people are loath to take responsibility, even when it is clear that they are at fault. Liability for crash expenses depends heavily on the allocation of fault.
How can those affected by a recent wreck prove that another driver was at fault for the crash?
1. Camera footage or witness statements
Outside parties who witnessed the crash can affirm claims that one driver was clearly to blame. There could also be camera footage from traffic, dashboard or even security cameras.
2. Digital or forensic evidence
If one driver claims that the other texted and caused the crash, police officers could request usage data from the mobile service provider of the at-fault driver. If one driver claims that the other showed signs of intoxication, chemical testing could help validate those claims.
3. Collision reconstruction
When there are no witnesses or camera footage and the crash occurs not due to distraction or intoxication but simply bad choices, software or professionals can help prove fault. Collision reconstruction uses photographs of the crash scene, information about damage to the vehicles and other details to recreate what occurred. A professional reconstruction could help validate allegations that the other driver blatantly violated the speed limit or ran a red light.
Proving who was at fault for a motor vehicle collision can pave the way to economic justice when the driver at fault denies their culpability. Those hoping to hold another driver accountable for causing a crash may need help gathering evidence and evaluating their different options for compensation, and that’s okay.